Hughes and Lawson claim that "despite the spread of electoral democracy, few countries in Latin America have established the sort of media regimes that systematically reinforce popular representation and governmental accountability" (9). The region's media are dominated by private organizations that often drown out approaches found in independent publications. Because the news media plays a strong role in modem democracy, "increasing independence and pluralism in the media remains an important element of the political reform agenda in Latin America" (9). In recent Latin American history, official repression has been the biggest hindrance to the opening of media. Media outlets rarely face state-sponsored censorship.
Liberal democracy has brought new stability throughout South America and has contributed to investigative reporting by ushering in a better environment for journalists.
Democracy, doesn't guarantee complete 'freedom of press,' but it stops state-sanctioned violence against reporters. Government censorship decreased greatly once the military relinquished power and the overall situation has improved considerably. Hughes and Lawson state that "Latin American media is hardly free from threats and pressures from political actors of all stripes, including govemment officials" (10).
In Latin America, the last decade has witnessed a serious erosion of press freedom throughout the region "that parallels the larger 'hollowing out' of democracy in many countries" (10).
In the article Press Liberalization, the New Media, and the 'Coptic Question,' Elsasser explains that "the year 2005 in Egypt witnessed a period of political liberalization" (131). The nation saw its least-manipulated legislative election in it's recent history and its first multi-candidate presidential election. Unfortunately "hopes for substantial political change were soon replaced by disillusionment, as the regime again tightened its grip on the political scene in the following years" (131). However, there is one legacy of the liberalization period that remains, and this is that Egypt still has a "more independent, more diversified and more critical press, which had been developing since the late 1990s" (131).
In summary, "while the independent press created more open and integrated public spaces, the new media until now have displayed a distinct tendency in the opposite direction" (147).
New media in Latin America and Egypt is greatly influenced by the government. This influence has been strict in recent history, but 'freedom of speech' is becoming popular in many nations and the government's hold on media is beginning to look diffrent. The relationship between new media and politics is ever-changing and will continue to do so.
Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2005). The Barriers to Media Opening in Latin America. Political Communication, 22 (1), 9-25.
Elsasser, S. (2010). Press Liberalization, the New Media, and the 'Coptic Question': Muslim-Coptic Relations in Egypt in a Changing Media Landscape. Middle Eastern Studies, 46(1), 131-150.